Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:49

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Climate change leads to spread of infection-causing fungi, scientists say - ABC News
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What do you love doing for fun?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Minima tempora consequatur voluptas sequi aspernatur corporis.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Fallout 5 announcement slammed by fans: ‘I don’t understand’ - GAMINGbible
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Popular home goods retailer files for bankruptcy, plans to close 26 stores initially - 10TV
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.